.png)
You've seen the testimonials everywhere: "I lost 30 pounds with this one weird trick!" or "This 15-minute workout gave me abs in 6 weeks!" Assuming the results are real to begin with, these types of claims tap into our desire for simple solutions to complex problems. They tend to rely on a fundamental logical error known as post hoc ergo propter hoc, from the Latin for "after this, therefore because of this."
This fallacy occurs when we assume that because one event followed another, the first event caused the second. In fitness marketing, this translates to attributing dramatic results to a single program, product, or method while ignoring the complex web of factors that actually drive transformation. Understanding this fallacy is essential for navigating an industry that profits from oversimplified cause-and-effect relationships, especially on social media!
The fitness industry generates billions in revenue annually, with a significant amount coming from marketing that exploits our susceptibility to post hoc reasoning. The consequences of falling for this fallacy extend beyond wasted money to include unrealistic expectations, damaged self-esteem, and abandoned health goals.
The Federal Trade Commission has documented numerous cases where companies exploited this fallacy for profit. In 2003, the FTC charged companies marketing electronic abdominal exercise belts with falsely advertising that users could achieve "six-pack abs" without diet or traditional exercise. These claims embodied the post hoc fallacy perfectly by suggesting that using the device (event A) was the sole cause of abdominal transformation (event B), while completely ignoring the essential roles of nutrition, overall body fat percentage, and comprehensive fitness routines. After all, a lot of visible abs are a direct consequence of having low body fat versus how many crunches you do.
Social media has amplified this problem exponentially. Research on "fitspiration" content reveals how before/after transformation images can be psychologically manipulative, presenting dramatic visual changes without enough context about the multiple variables that contributed to the results to create a truly realistic model for a person new to fitness and nutrition to duplicate. These posts rarely mention things like stress reduction, improved sleep patterns, or the simple fact that the person may have been sedentary for years before starting any structured approach. That said, there are some great transformation stories online that can be inspiring, but it’s still important to remember that everyone’s journey is different and their struggles may not be your struggles.
Let's examine weight loss as our primary example of the post hoc ergo propter hoc, though this fallacy applies to virtually any fitness goal. While many well-designed programs combining resistance training and cardiovascular exercise contribute to weight management, the scientific evidence reveals a more nuanced picture than most marketing suggests.
The Diet vs. Exercise Reality
Systematic reviews like Johns, D. J, et al. (2014) consistently demonstrate that dietary interventions produce significantly greater weight loss than exercise alone. This research foundation, as well as countless other studies, support the popular saying "you can't out-train a bad diet," but it doesn't diminish exercise's crucial role in overall health and long-term weight maintenance. It really is best to think of exercise as part of the whole picture but it is not the primary driver of weight loss, we really should be looking at calories in and calories out. Exercise is an avenue for calories out. Restricting calorie intake is much more practical.
Consider the practical numbers: a 20-ounce soda contains approximately 250 calories, which requires 25-30 minutes of moderate-intensity exercise (jogging) to burn off. It's far more efficient to avoid consuming those calories initially than to "work them off" later. This approach also prevents the problematic psychological patterns of using exercise as punishment for eating or as permission to consume junk food.
The fitness industry provides countless examples of post hoc fallacies being leveraged for marketing purposes.
Social Media Transformations
Instagram's "Transformation Tuesday" posts frequently showcase dramatic before/after photos with captions attributing success to a specific exercise program, dietary regimen, supplement, etc. As mentioned earlier, these posts lack the context of the lived experience of the person and you may struggle with different things than they did. Even if they say everything they did during their weight loss, it’s still a snapshot of the last six months to a year, or whichever timeframe they are showing in the post.
Celebrity Endorsements
When actors credit their superhero physiques to specific workout routines, they're employing post hoc reasoning by ignoring the comprehensive support systems that made their transformations possible: professional trainers, nutritionists, chefs, optimal recovery conditions, and sometimes pharmaceutical assistance with anabolic substances. The workout becomes a convenient scapegoat for a complete lifestyle overhaul that most consumers cannot hope to replicate naturally. This isn’t true in every case but it is definitely worth being aware of to keep your expectations in check, especially if there’s a specific celebrity you look up to.
Supplement Marketing
Companies routinely present testimonials from individuals who used their products while simultaneously following strict diet and exercise regimens, then attribute the results primarily to the supplement. The FTC has repeatedly taken action against such deceptive practices, but new examples emerge constantly as companies find creative ways to imply causation without explicitly stating it.
Understanding why we're susceptible to post hoc reasoning in fitness requires examining some of the cognitive biases that make these marketing tactics effective.
Survivorship Bias occurs when we focus on successful outcomes while overlooking failures. In fitness marketing, dramatic transformation stories are widely shared, while the majority of people who tried the same program and saw modest or no results remain invisible. This creates a skewed perception that the program is universally effective.
The Halo Effect causes one positive trait to influence our perception of others. If a celebrity endorses a product or a fitness influencer has an impressive physique, their perceived success creates a "halo" that makes us more likely to believe their recommendations are effective, regardless of the actual evidence.
The post hoc fallacy rarely operates in isolation. Several related logical errors compound the problem in fitness marketing:
Cherry-picking involves selecting only favorable data while ignoring contradictory evidence. A supplement company might highlight one small positive study while ignoring numerous larger studies showing no benefit.
Anecdotal Evidence relies on personal stories as conclusive proof rather than systematic research. While individual testimonials can be inspiring, they don't constitute scientific evidence. "I lost 15 pounds doing X, so X must work for everyone" exemplifies this fallacy.
Appeal to Authority occurs when claims are deemed true simply because an "authority" figure endorses them, without proper evidence or demonstrated expertise. Claims like "Dr. X recommends this approach" without detailing Dr. X's qualifications (they may hold a PhD in an unrelated field), the supporting research, or the context represent this fallacy.
Now that you are aware of these fallacies, you can become a more discerning consumer of fitness content. Here's some things you can do:
Critical Questions to Ask:
Red Flags to Watch For:
Evidence Standards to Demand:
When beginning your fitness journey, you'll often see significant improvements with simple, sustainable habits. This initial progress occurs because you're addressing multiple new health habits simultaneously and your body is adapting to those changes. These early successes are genuinely encouraging, but understanding their multifactorial nature prevents unrealistic expectations as progress naturally slows. When this happens, you just need to make minor adjustments, it doesn’t mean ditch the plan and chase after some supplement with grandiose claims.
The post hoc fallacy thrives in an industry that profits from selling simple solutions to complex problems. True, lasting fitness results emerge from the interaction of multiple factors: consistent exercise, appropriate nutrition, adequate recovery, stress management, and sustainable behavior change. No single workout, diet, or supplement is responsible for dramatic transformations, despite what compelling marketing might suggest.
The most successful fitness transformations happen over months and years, not weeks, and they involve comprehensive lifestyle changes rather than single interventions. By understanding logical fallacies like post hoc ergo propter hoc, you can navigate fitness marketing more effectively, set realistic expectations, and ultimately achieve more sustainable results.
Remember: the best program is the one you can follow consistently. Master the fundamentals, stay consistent, and let time and compound effort create the lasting changes you're seeking.
Børsheim, E., & Bahr, R. (2003). Effect of exercise intensity, duration and mode on post-exercise oxygen consumption. Sports Medicine, 33(14), 1037-1060.
Federal Trade Commission. (2003). FTC settles charges against abdominal exercise belt marketers.
Johns, D. J., Hartmann-Boyce, J., Jebb, S. A., Aveyard, P., & Behavioural Weight Management Review Group (2014). Diet or exercise interventions vs combined behavioral weight management programs: a systematic review and meta-analysis of direct comparisons. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 114(10), 1557–1568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2014.07.005
