.png)
How is it possible that 72% of Americans feel confident in their ability to maintain heart health as they age, yet nearly one in four remain uncertain whether they are at increased risk for heart disease—despite 69% reporting at least one known risk factor? This paradox, revealed in Cleveland Clinic's 2026 American Heart Month survey, illuminates a fundamental challenge facing contemporary health promotion efforts: the gap between perceived competence and actual health literacy. The survey, conducted by YouGov in early December 2025 with 1,273 American adults, provides valuable insights into how the public conceptualizes healthy aging, understands cardiovascular risk, and prioritizes prevention strategies (Cleveland Clinic, 2026). What makes this disconnect particularly concerning is that it occurs during a period of unprecedented public interest in longevity and wellness, suggesting that increased attention to health topics does not automatically translate into accurate risk assessment or informed decision-making.
In my experience working with individuals across the health literacy spectrum, this pattern emerges consistently: people often express confidence in their health management capabilities while simultaneously demonstrating significant knowledge gaps about the specific risk factors that threaten their wellbeing. The Cleveland Clinic data quantifies this phenomenon at a national scale, revealing that optimism about aging well coexists with widespread misunderstanding of cardiovascular risk factors. When we examine the survey findings through the lens of health education and behavior change theory, a clear picture emerges: Americans possess the right intentions and general health awareness, but they lack the structured foundational knowledge necessary to translate those intentions into effective preventive action. This analysis explores what the survey reveals about public health literacy, examines the implications for cardiovascular disease prevention, and considers how comprehensive health and wellness education can bridge the gap between confidence and competence.
The survey's findings on how Americans conceptualize longevity reveal a remarkably pragmatic and democratized understanding of healthy aging. When asked what longevity means to them, respondents prioritized staying physically active and mobile (62%), maintaining cognitive health and mental sharpness (56%), and preserving independence and quality of life (56%) (Cleveland Clinic, 2026). These responses demonstrate that the public correctly understands longevity not as mere survival but as sustained functional capacity and autonomy—a perspective that aligns closely with gerontological research on successful aging.
Particularly encouraging is the finding that only 5% of respondents associated longevity with expensive or elite medical treatments, and just 6% viewed it as something reserved for celebrities or the wealthy. This suggests that despite the proliferation of boutique wellness services and biohacking protocols marketed to affluent consumers, most Americans maintain realistic expectations about what drives healthy aging. In terms of practical application, this perspective creates fertile ground for public health messaging: when people already believe that longevity stems from everyday behaviors rather than exclusive interventions, they should theoretically be more receptive to evidence-based lifestyle recommendations.
The challenge, however, lies in translating this conceptual understanding into specific behavioral implementation. Recognizing that physical activity matters for healthy aging represents an important first step, but it does not automatically confer the knowledge necessary to design an effective exercise program, troubleshoot barriers to consistency, or adapt routines when circumstances change. Research on positive self-perceptions of aging supports the value of optimistic attitudes toward growing older. A landmark study found that older individuals with more positive self-perceptions of aging, measured up to 23 years earlier, lived 7.5 years longer than those with negative perceptions—an effect that remained significant even when controlling for age, gender, socioeconomic status, loneliness, and functional health (Levy et al., 2002). This suggests that the optimism captured in the Cleveland Clinic survey could indeed support health-promoting behaviors, provided that optimism is paired with the practical knowledge and skills necessary for implementation.
While Americans demonstrate appropriate optimism about the possibility of aging well, the survey exposes significant deficits in cardiovascular risk factor awareness that undermine their capacity to act on that optimism effectively. The finding that 24% of respondents are uncertain whether they are at increased risk for heart disease, despite 69% reporting at least one known risk factor, represents more than simple confusion—it reveals fundamental gaps in health literacy that compromise preventive efforts (Cleveland Clinic, 2026).
Breaking down the specific risk factors reported by survey participants provides additional context for this awareness gap. High blood pressure was the most commonly reported risk factor at 31%, followed by high cholesterol (24%), family history (23%), obesity (20%), poor diet (18%), sedentary lifestyle (17%), daily unmanaged stress (16%), sleep apnea (15%), smoking (14%), and diabetes (13%) (Cleveland Clinic, 2026). The distribution of these risk factors is consistent with broader epidemiological data showing that cardiovascular disease risk factors are highly prevalent among American adults, with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reporting that the percentage of adults with two or more cardiovascular disease risk factors increases substantially with age (CDC, 2025).
The survey's revelation that nearly half of respondents (49%) don't know that diabetes increases heart disease risk, and more than four in ten (44%) are unaware that physical inactivity is a major contributor, demonstrates that even among individuals who possess some health knowledge, critical gaps persist. These findings align with research demonstrating that health literacy plays a protective role in cardiovascular disease prevention. A scoping review examining health literacy and primary prevention of cardiovascular disease found consistent associations between lower health literacy and increased cardiovascular risk, with health literacy influencing both risk factor awareness and the adoption of preventive behaviors (Beasant et al., 2025).
What concerns me most about these findings is not simply that people lack specific pieces of information—after all, no one can be expected to know every detail about cardiovascular physiology—but rather that the pattern suggests an absence of the conceptual framework necessary to connect their known risk factors to their overall cardiovascular health status. An individual might acknowledge having high blood pressure and a sedentary lifestyle without understanding that these factors interact synergistically to elevate risk beyond what either factor would contribute independently. This type of systems thinking about health represents a higher level of understanding than simple fact recall, corresponding to the analysis and evaluation levels of Bloom's Taxonomy of cognitive development. As I've discussed in my writing on comprehensive wellness education, effective health literacy requires not just remembering facts but developing the capacity to analyze relationships between health behaviors, physiological responses, and disease outcomes.
Among the awareness gaps revealed by the Cleveland Clinic survey, perhaps none carries more concerning implications than the finding that 71% of Americans are unaware that women's heart disease risk increases after menopause (Cleveland Clinic, 2026). This represents a critical blind spot in public health literacy, particularly given that cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death among women and that the menopause transition marks a distinct inflection point in cardiovascular risk trajectory.
The biological mechanisms underlying this increased risk are well-established in the medical literature. The decline in estrogen production that characterizes menopause is associated with several adverse cardiovascular changes, including increases in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, decreases in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, increased arterial stiffness, and heightened inflammatory markers—all of which contribute to elevated cardiovascular disease risk (El Khoudary et al., 2020). The American Heart Association's scientific statement on menopause transition and cardiovascular disease risk emphasizes that women who experience menopause at an earlier age face particularly elevated risk, with premature menopause (before age 40) associated with a twofold increased risk of cardiovascular disease (El Khoudary et al., 2020).
What makes this knowledge gap particularly problematic is that the menopause transition represents an ideal intervention window for cardiovascular disease prevention in women. During this period, women are typically in regular contact with healthcare providers for management of menopausal symptoms, creating natural opportunities for cardiovascular risk assessment and lifestyle counseling. However, if women themselves are unaware of their changing risk profile, they may not prioritize cardiovascular health discussions during these visits, and if healthcare providers fail to proactively address cardiovascular risk during menopause management, a critical prevention opportunity is lost.
The gender dimensions of this awareness gap extend beyond individual women's knowledge. When 71% of Americans overall are unaware of the menopause-cardiovascular disease connection, this suggests that male partners, adult children, and family members who might otherwise support women's health-promoting behaviors during midlife also lack this crucial information. From a health promotion perspective, this represents a missed opportunity for social support mechanisms that research consistently identifies as critical for successful behavior change. Addressing this gap requires not only better patient education from healthcare providers but also broader public health campaigns that normalize discussions of menopause as a cardiovascular health transition, not merely a reproductive health endpoint.
The Cleveland Clinic survey reveals an encouraging paradox regarding Americans' health behaviors: despite knowledge gaps about specific risk factors, a substantial majority (84%) report having made at least one positive health change, including eating healthier (40%), being more conscious of health numbers (36%), exercising more (27%), and improving sleep (25%) (Cleveland Clinic, 2026). These figures suggest that Americans are indeed taking action to improve their health, which should theoretically translate into better cardiovascular outcomes over time.
However, when we place these behavior change statistics in the context of ongoing health challenges, a more complex picture emerges. The same survey reveals that over the past decade, 33% of respondents report rising stress levels, 29% report less sleep, and 29% report weight gain—all of which are established cardiovascular risk factors (Cleveland Clinic, 2026). This apparent contradiction—simultaneous health improvements and health deteriorations—reflects the dynamic and often challenging nature of behavior change in real-world contexts.
In my view, this pattern suggests that while many Americans are making genuine efforts to improve their health, these efforts frequently remain fragmented rather than comprehensive, and they may lack the sustainability necessary for long-term cardiovascular disease prevention. Consider, for example, an individual who reports "eating healthier" as a positive change. Without a clear understanding of what constitutes a heart-healthy dietary pattern—including appropriate balance of macronutrients, adequate fiber intake, limitation of processed foods, and attention to overall caloric balance—this well-intentioned behavior change might yield minimal cardiovascular benefit. Similarly, "exercising more" could mean anything from a sustainable program that meets evidence-based physical activity guidelines to sporadic gym visits that produce little physiological adaptation.
Research on lifestyle strategies for cardiovascular disease risk reduction, prevention, and treatment emphasizes that the most effective approaches involve comprehensive behavior change across multiple domains rather than isolated modifications in single behaviors. A review published in the American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine found that regular physical activity, sound nutrition, weight management, and tobacco avoidance have all been demonstrated to significantly reduce cardiovascular disease risk, with the greatest benefits observed when multiple lifestyle factors are addressed simultaneously (Rippe, 2019). This suggests that the fragmented approach to health improvement reflected in the Cleveland Clinic survey data, while commendable, may fall short of what is needed for substantial cardiovascular disease risk reduction.
The challenge for health promotion professionals and healthcare providers is to help individuals transition from making isolated health improvements to implementing integrated lifestyle management strategies that address multiple risk factors simultaneously. This requires not just motivational support but also the development of health literacy skills that enable individuals to understand how different aspects of their lifestyle interact to influence cardiovascular health. As I've emphasized in previous analyses of comprehensive health education programs, effective behavior change requires moving beyond simple awareness of what one should do to develop genuine understanding of why specific behaviors matter, how to implement them effectively, and how to troubleshoot obstacles when they inevitably arise.
The Cleveland Clinic survey finding that 72% of Americans feel confident in their ability to maintain heart health as they age initially seems encouraging (Cleveland Clinic, 2026). Confidence represents an important psychological prerequisite for behavior change, as individuals who doubt their capacity to influence their health outcomes may not invest effort in preventive behaviors. However, when this confidence coexists with the substantial knowledge gaps documented elsewhere in the survey, it raises important questions about whether this confidence is appropriately calibrated to actual competence.
From a health education perspective, there exists an important distinction between warranted confidence—grounded in genuine knowledge and skills—and unwarranted confidence that stems from insufficient awareness of the complexity of the challenge at hand. Research in metacognition, the process of thinking about one's own thinking, consistently demonstrates that individuals with limited knowledge in a domain often overestimate their competence, a phenomenon sometimes referred to as the Dunning-Kruger effect. In the context of health management, this can manifest as individuals feeling confident about their ability to prevent cardiovascular disease while simultaneously harboring significant misconceptions about risk factors, prevention strategies, or the interpretation of health metrics.
Dr. Samir Kapadia, chair of cardiovascular medicine at Cleveland Clinic, emphasized in the survey announcement that "Heart disease often develops silently over decades, which is why staying active, understanding your risk factors, and addressing them early can make a profound difference in both quality of life and longevity" (Cleveland Clinic, 2026). This statement underscores a critical challenge: the asymptomatic nature of early cardiovascular disease development means that individuals may feel healthy and confident in their cardiovascular status while subclinical disease processes are already underway.
The healthcare system's role in closing this confidence-competence gap is crucial but faces significant structural barriers. Primary care physicians, who serve as the frontline for cardiovascular disease prevention, operate under severe time constraints that limit their capacity to provide comprehensive lifestyle counseling during routine appointments. A typical primary care visit lasts 15-20 minutes and must address multiple competing priorities, including management of acute concerns, chronic disease monitoring, preventive screening, and administrative documentation requirements. Within this constrained timeframe, the depth of lifestyle counseling that can be provided is necessarily limited.
This structural challenge has led me to advocate for scalable health education solutions that complement, rather than replace, clinical encounters. As I've outlined in discussing primary care lifestyle counseling strategies, brief behavioral interventions delivered during office visits can initiate behavior change, but they require reinforcement through structured educational programming that patients can access between appointments. This hybrid approach leverages the trusted relationship between patients and their healthcare providers while acknowledging the practical limitations of what can be accomplished during brief clinical encounters.
The gap between Americans' confidence in their heart health management abilities and their actual knowledge of cardiovascular risk factors reveals a fundamental challenge that extends beyond any single survey finding: the difference between information access and genuine health literacy. In an era characterized by unprecedented availability of health information through internet searches, social media health influencers, and direct-to-consumer health technology, Americans are not suffering primarily from lack of information access. Rather, the challenge lies in developing the critical thinking skills necessary to evaluate information quality, integrate disparate pieces of health knowledge into coherent understanding, and apply that understanding to personal decision-making in complex, real-world contexts.
Health literacy, as defined by the Institute of Medicine, represents "the degree to which individuals have the capacity to obtain, process, and understand basic health information and services needed to make appropriate health decisions" (Ratzan & Parker, 2000). This definition emphasizes that health literacy involves not merely accessing information but processing and understanding it sufficiently to guide action. Research examining the relationship between health literacy and cardiovascular disease has consistently demonstrated that individuals with lower health literacy face increased cardiovascular disease risk, poorer disease management outcomes when cardiovascular disease develops, and reduced engagement with preventive health services (Magnani et al., 2018).
What distinguishes health literacy from simple health knowledge is the development of schema—organized patterns of thought that allow individuals to connect new information to existing understanding, recognize patterns across different health contexts, and transfer learning from one situation to analogous situations. Consider the difference between an individual who has memorized that "high blood pressure increases heart disease risk" versus one who understands the physiological mechanisms by which elevated blood pressure damages arterial walls over time, recognizes how this process interacts with other risk factors like high cholesterol and diabetes, and can therefore make informed decisions about the relative importance of different preventive strategies in their personal context.
This distinction between superficial knowledge and deep understanding corresponds directly to different levels of Bloom's Taxonomy, the hierarchical framework for categorizing educational learning objectives that I have discussed extensively in my analysis of corporate wellness education strategies. Lower-level taxonomy stages—remembering and understanding—involve recall of facts and basic comprehension. Middle-level stages—applying and analyzing—require using knowledge in new situations and examining relationships between concepts. Higher-level stages—evaluating and creating—involve making informed judgments and generating novel solutions to problems. Comprehensive health literacy requires progression through all these levels, not merely the acquisition of facts that characterizes the lower levels.
The Cleveland Clinic survey findings suggest that many Americans remain at the lower levels of this cognitive hierarchy when it comes to cardiovascular health. They may remember that exercise is important for heart health (remember level) and understand that it provides cardiovascular benefits (understand level), but they may lack the capacity to apply exercise principles to design an effective personal fitness program (apply level), analyze why their previous exercise attempts failed (analyze level), evaluate different exercise modalities for effectiveness and sustainability in their specific context (evaluate level), or create integrated lifestyle plans that address multiple cardiovascular risk factors simultaneously (create level).
When nearly one in four Americans cannot accurately assess their own cardiovascular disease risk despite the majority possessing at least one known risk factor, we face a public health challenge that requires systematic educational intervention rather than merely enhanced information dissemination. The confidence-knowledge gap revealed by the Cleveland Clinic survey demonstrates that good intentions and general health awareness, while necessary, are insufficient for effective cardiovascular disease prevention at the population level.
The solution requires comprehensive health and wellness education that builds genuine health literacy through structured progression from basic knowledge to sophisticated application. Such education must address not only what individuals should do to protect cardiovascular health but also why specific behaviors matter, how to implement them effectively within real-world constraints, how to troubleshoot common obstacles, and how to evaluate and adapt strategies based on personal response. This depth of understanding cannot be achieved through brief informational interventions or episodic exposure to health messages; it requires sustained engagement with carefully sequenced educational content that builds progressively more sophisticated understanding over time.
The evidence supporting comprehensive lifestyle interventions for cardiovascular disease prevention is robust. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends offering or referring adults with cardiovascular disease risk factors to behavioral counseling interventions to promote healthy diet and physical activity, based on evidence that such interventions produce modest but meaningful improvements in cardiovascular risk factors including blood pressure, lipid profiles, and glucose control (U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, 2022). What distinguishes the most effective interventions is not simply their content but their educational structure: they employ multiple sessions of behavioral counseling that allow for progressive skill development, they provide opportunities for practice and feedback, and they address not just knowledge acquisition but also the development of self-regulation skills necessary for sustained behavior change.
For individuals seeking to move beyond surface-level health awareness to develop genuine cardiovascular health literacy, structured educational programs offer significant advantages over self-directed learning from fragmented information sources. Comprehensive curricula provide systematic coverage of essential topics in logical sequence, ensure that foundational concepts are mastered before advancing to more complex applications, and integrate different aspects of health management into coherent frameworks rather than treating them as isolated behaviors. The Innova Vita Health & Wellness Course, for example, addresses this need through nine comprehensive modules covering disease prevention fundamentals, nutrition science, exercise physiology, weight management, healthy lifestyle factors, and research literacy—all grounded in over 90 peer-reviewed studies and designed to develop not just knowledge but also the critical thinking skills necessary for lifelong health management.
The Cleveland Clinic survey findings carry important implications for how healthcare providers and public health professionals approach cardiovascular disease prevention. The recognition that most Americans possess good intentions and express confidence in their health management abilities, yet simultaneously harbor significant knowledge gaps, suggests that the most effective interventions will be those that leverage existing motivation while systematically addressing literacy deficits.
For primary care physicians and other healthcare providers working with patients on cardiovascular disease prevention, the survey results underscore the importance of not assuming that patient confidence reflects actual competence. When patients express that they are "eating healthier" or "exercising more," providers should probe beyond these general statements to assess whether patients possess the specific knowledge necessary to make these behaviors effective for cardiovascular disease prevention. Does the patient understand what constitutes a heart-healthy dietary pattern? Can they identify and limit sources of saturated fat, added sugars, and excessive sodium in their diet? Do they understand the distinction between different types of physical activity—aerobic exercise, resistance training, and flexibility work—and the role each plays in cardiovascular health?
For patients who demonstrate motivation but lack structured knowledge, referral to comprehensive health education programs represents a valuable intervention strategy. While individual dietary counseling with a registered dietitian or exercise guidance from a certified fitness professional can certainly benefit patients, the systematic development of health literacy across multiple domains—nutrition, exercise, sleep, stress management, and chronic disease prevention—requires a more comprehensive educational approach. Healthcare providers who establish relationships with evidence-based health education programs can streamline referrals, just as they would for diabetes self-management education or cardiac rehabilitation programs.
From a public health perspective, the survey findings suggest that broad-based health literacy initiatives should be prioritized as primary prevention strategies. While targeted interventions for high-risk individuals certainly remain important, the fact that two-thirds of Americans report at least one cardiovascular risk factor means that population-level education could benefit the majority of adults. This might include worksite wellness programs that incorporate comprehensive health education rather than merely offering biometric screenings or fitness challenges, community-based education initiatives through libraries, senior centers, and faith communities, and integration of health literacy education into school curricula to establish strong foundations before cardiovascular risk factors develop.
The survey finding that Americans overwhelmingly believe there are steps people can take at any stage of life to improve longevity and reduce heart disease risk (95%) creates a favorable environment for health promotion messaging (Cleveland Clinic, 2026). This nearly universal belief in the modifiability of cardiovascular health outcomes suggests that Americans are not suffering from fatalism or hopelessness but rather from lack of structured guidance on how to translate that belief into effective action. Public health campaigns that emphasize not just the importance of healthy behaviors but also provide clear, actionable guidance on implementation may find particularly receptive audiences.
Cleveland Clinic's 2026 survey captures a snapshot of American cardiovascular health literacy at a pivotal moment. The convergence of high confidence, genuine motivation, significant knowledge gaps, and simultaneously improving and deteriorating health behaviors paints a picture of a population striving toward better health but lacking the comprehensive tools necessary to get there consistently and sustainably.
What gives me hope about these findings is not the knowledge gaps themselves—those can be addressed through better education—but rather the underlying optimism and belief in personal agency that Americans express. The recognition that healthy aging stems from everyday behaviors rather than expensive interventions, the near-universal belief that risk can be modified at any life stage, and the substantial proportion already making positive health changes all suggest a population that is ready to engage with comprehensive health promotion efforts.
The challenge before us as health professionals, educators, and public health advocates is to meet that readiness with educational resources that truly serve it. This requires moving beyond simplistic information campaigns toward comprehensive literacy development, beyond episodic health messaging toward sustained educational engagement, and beyond generic advice toward personalized guidance that helps individuals apply evidence-based principles within their unique contexts.
The gap between confidence and competence revealed by this survey need not persist. With systematic attention to health literacy as a foundational public health priority, we can develop a population that possesses not just optimism about aging well but also the knowledge, skills, and critical thinking abilities necessary to make that optimism a reality. For those of us committed to cardiovascular disease prevention, this represents both our greatest challenge and our greatest opportunity.
Beasant, B., Anderson, G., Vaughan, V., Lotfaliany, M., & Hosking, S. (2025). Health literacy and primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: A scoping review. Public Health Reports, 140(4), 342–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/00333549251322649
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2025). Prevalence of cardiovascular disease risk factors in adults. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db540.htm
Cleveland Clinic. (2026, February 3). Cleveland Clinic survey finds Americans optimistic about aging well, but many overlook heart disease risks [Press release]. https://newsroom.clevelandclinic.org/2026/02/03/cleveland-clinic-survey-finds-americans-optimistic-about-aging-well-but-many-overlook-heart-disease-risks
El Khoudary, S. R., Aggarwal, B., Beckie, T. M., Hodis, H. N., Johnson, A. E., Langer, R. D., Limacher, M. C., Manson, J. E., Stefanick, M. L., Allison, M. A., & American Heart Association Prevention Science Committee of the Council on Epidemiology and Prevention; and Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing. (2020). Menopause transition and cardiovascular disease risk: Implications for timing of early prevention: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation, 142(25), e506–e532. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000912
Levy, B. R., Slade, M. D., Kunkel, S. R., & Kasl, S. V. (2002). Longevity increased by positive self-perceptions of aging. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(2), 261–270. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.2.261
Magnani, J. W., Mujahid, M. S., Aronow, H. D., Cené, C. W., Dickson, V. V., Havranek, E., Morgenstern, L. B., Paasche-Orlow, M. K., Pollak, A., Willey, J. Z., & American Heart Association Council on Epidemiology and Prevention; Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease; Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research; and Stroke Council. (2018). Health literacy and cardiovascular disease: Fundamental relevance to primary and secondary prevention: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation, 138(2), e48–e74. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000579
Ratzan, S. C., & Parker, R. M. (2000). Introduction. In C. R. Selden, M. Zorn, S. C. Ratzan, & R. M. Parker (Eds.), National Library of Medicine current bibliographies in medicine: Health literacy. National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Rippe, J. M. (2019). Lifestyle strategies for risk factor reduction, prevention, and treatment of cardiovascular disease. American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine, 13(2), 204–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/1559827618812395
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. (2022). Behavioral counseling interventions to promote a healthy diet and physical activity for cardiovascular disease prevention in adults without cardiovascular disease risk factors: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA, 328(4), 367–374. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2022.10951
